Study on the flySSAT UpperPractice testReading

SSAT Upper

SSAT Upper Reading practice test

  • 40 questions
  • 40 minutes
  • A wrong answer costs 1/4 of a right one
  • Free

The Reading section of the SSAT Upper practice test — 40 questions. Mark your answers, then press Finish at the bottom to see your score.

This is the same test the app serves as Practice Test 1. Working it here spends it: these questions will not be new when you take the test against the clock in the app.

Nothing is marked while you work, just as on the real test. The answers and the worked explanations open when you finish. What you mark is kept in this browser, so closing the tab does not lose it.

Questions 1–5

At a sharp bend in the Willow River, the
outside of the curve has been bitten
into a steep collapsing wall, while the
inside edge slopes gently into a bar
5
of pale sand. Foam and fallen leaves
hurry around the outer curve and linger
near the sandbar, tracing two different
speeds in the same river.
The river does not decide to move sideways
10
all at once. On the outside of each bend,
faster water pulls soil away grain by
grain, undercutting the bank until slabs
of earth slump in. On the inside, slower
water drops some of the sand and silt it
15
has been carrying, building the bar
farther into the channel. This relentless
pairing of removal and deposit makes the
bend stretch farther across the valley
each year. The change is slow enough to
20
escape a casual glance. A fence post
that once stood several steps from the
water can, after enough springs, lean
dangerously close to the eroding bank.
Old maps of the valley show blue loops
25
no longer connected to the main river.
A growing bend can become so narrow at
its neck that floodwater cuts across it.
The abandoned loop becomes a quiet pond,
while the main channel takes the shorter
30
path. From one season to the next, the
river may look fixed because it occupies
roughly the same place. Across many years,
however, it is slowly rewriting the shape
of the land.

Question 1

The passage primarily explains how a river

Show answer

Answer: B — can slowly shift across land through erosion and deposition

The passage explains that faster water erodes the outside of bends while slower water deposits material inside them, causing a river to move sideways over time. Old maps record later results but are not the only measure; oxbow cutoff is occasional, not every flood; the inner sandbar is the slower side; and an abandoned loop does not end the river’s change.

Question 2

In line 16, “relentless” most nearly means

Show answer

Answer: D — persistent

The pairing of removal and deposit continues year after year without letting up, so relentless means persistent. Sudden would fit a single flood or slump, not a pairing that keeps going. Careless would suggest inattention, but the word describes the process’s refusal to stop. Destructive names an effect of erosion rather than the pairing’s unceasing quality. Gradual describes how slowly the land changes, not what relentless means.

Question 3

According to the passage’s explanation, the fence post described in lines 20–23 might become unsafe over time because

Show answer

Answer: C — faster water might remove the surrounding soil grain by grain.

The passage specifically explains that faster water along the outside of a bend pulls soil away grain by grain, eventually leaving a nearby post dangerously close to the eroding bank.

Question 4

What do foam and fallen leaves in the current show about the water in the bend?

Show answer

Answer: A — The current moves faster around the outer curve than near the inside sandbar.

Foam and fallen leaves hurry around the outer curve and linger near the sandbar, showing that the current is faster on the outside of the bend and slower on the inside.

Question 5

Which best describes the organization of the passage?

Show answer

Answer: E — It begins with an observation, explains the process behind it, and then shows a longer-term result.

The passage starts with what can be seen at a bend, explains erosion and deposition, and ends with old loops and ponds formed over time.

Questions 6–10

A dictionary can record an insult without
recommending its use. Yet readers may see
a word’s presence as a kind of license:
if it belongs in a dictionary, they may
5
reason, it belongs in conversation. This
possibility divides editors who otherwise
agree that words deserve careful study.
Editors of historical dictionaries often
include offensive words because silence
10
would leave gaps in the record. A reader
encountering an insult in an old speech
may need to know whom it targeted and how
severely it was intended to wound. Labels
such as “offensive” can supply guidance
15
that a definition alone cannot provide.
Other editors begin with their audience.
A dictionary prepared for young children
may omit a term that its readers seldom
meet. Its editors may also believe that
20
printing the insult gives it an authority
no warning can entirely undo. Omission,
however, can leave a child puzzled when
that same term appears beyond the book.
The disagreement therefore concerns more
25
than whether a word exists. It concerns
what readers should receive from a book:
a record of language, guidance in using
it, or a careful balance of these aims.
Neither inclusion nor omission relieves
30
editors of the need to explain a choice.

Question 6

Which issue is the central concern of the passage?

Show answer

Answer: C — The competing responsibilities involved in recording insulting language

C is correct because the passage examines how preserving language and guiding readers lead editors to different decisions about insults. A elevates a supporting historical example into the central problem; B narrows the discussion to children’s dictionaries; D mistakes an explanation of historical dictionaries for an endorsement of their superiority; E substitutes changes in word meanings for the editorial disagreement.

Question 7

The passage suggests all of the following about dictionary editors EXCEPT

Show answer

Answer: E — Some regard an insult’s age as evidence that it is harmless.

E is correct because the passage never says that editors consider old insults harmless. A accurately identifies historical editors’ concern about gaps in the record; B accurately reflects the consideration of words children seldom encounter; C accurately describes the additional guidance supplied by labels; D accurately states the concern that publication can lend an insult authority.

Question 8

What can be inferred from the discussion of labels in lines 13–15?

Show answer

Answer: B — Understanding a word’s meaning may be insufficient for judging its use.

B is correct because labels provide guidance beyond a definition, implying that knowing a word’s meaning does not fully explain the implications of using it. A confuses warning about offense with granting permission; C turns one function of a label into the main purpose of historical readers; D mistakes supplementary guidance for a replacement for definitions; E exaggerates guidance into certainty about every reader’s response.

Question 9

Which word best describes the author’s tone in lines 24–30?

Show answer

Answer: D — Measured

D is correct because the conclusion calmly weighs different purposes and assigns responsibility to editors taking either approach. A mistakes the demand for explanation for condemnation; B mistakes recognition of editorial responsibilities for praise; C reads an unresolved disagreement as an expression of defeat; E imports the earlier concern about harmful words into a conclusion that expresses no urgency or fear.

Question 10

As used in the first paragraph, “license” most nearly means which of the following?

Show answer

Answer: A — Permission

A is correct because readers may treat a dictionary entry as permission to use the word in conversation. B confuses permission with the status associated with appearing in a reference book; C substitutes the historical record discussed later for the implied approval described here; D confuses authorization to use a word with repeated use; E mistakes confidence in a dictionary for the permission readers infer from its contents.

Questions 11–15

Every Thursday, Nora entered the names
of the chess club’s players in a ledger.
A narrow column held each game’s result;
the broad one belonged to the players.
5
Her father had found her this occupation
after the secretary explained that only
boys could join. “You will learn a great
deal by watching,” her father had said,
as though watching were a kind of turn.
10
She had learned. From her desk beside the
radiator, she could see the nearest board
and follow the others by the occasional
calls for silence. She knew who attacked
too soon and who protected every pawn as
15
if it were the king. Sometimes the boys
asked her to settle a disagreement about
an earlier result. They accepted what she
said because it was written in the book.
One evening, Martin offered his opponent
20
a draw. Nora looked up from the ledger.
His bishop stood behind a pawn that he
could advance, opening a diagonal toward
the other king. She had examined just this
sort of position in a borrowed chess book,
25
although there the pieces looked tidier.
Her pencil stopped. Martin glanced at her
and then at the secretary, who was already
putting away the unused sets. “A draw,”
Martin repeated, and his opponent agreed.
30
After the boys left, the secretary paused
beside the board. He pushed Martin’s pawn
forward, considered the bishop, and gave
a small whistle. “He had something here.”
Nora kept her finger on the open ledger.
35
“I thought so,” she said. The secretary
smiled. “Our little recorder is becoming
an authority.” He looked toward her desk.
“We ought to get you a better chair. That
one must be uncomfortable for so long.”
40
Nora considered explaining that the chair
was quite comfortable. It faced the room
and stood close to the radiator; its legs
did not wobble like those of the chair
Martin had occupied. But the secretary
45
was waiting with the pleasant expression
of someone who had located a difficulty
and was ready to put it right. She merely
thanked him. When he turned away, she put
a draw beside Martin’s name. The column
50
was for what had happened on the board,
and she would keep it accurate. Then she
walked over to Martin’s unsteady chair,
sat down, and moved the pawn for herself.

Question 11

The passage is primarily concerned with

Show answer

Answer: A — A girl’s ability outgrowing the limited role assigned to her

A is correct because Nora demonstrates an understanding of chess that exceeds the recording role she is permitted to occupy. B adopts the father’s view while overlooking Nora’s exclusion; C mistakes an offer of furniture for a change in membership policy; D invents a struggle over accuracy when Nora records the draw without hesitation; E reduces the conflict over participation to a lesson about studying mistakes.

Question 12

Which of the following does the passage NOT indicate about Nora?

Show answer

Answer: C — She explains to the secretary why Martin should have continued playing.

C is correct because Nora merely confirms that she noticed the opportunity; she never explains the position to the secretary. A overlooks the borrowed chess book; B overlooks the boys’ reliance on her recorded results; D overlooks her observations about attacking and protecting pawns; E overlooks her favorable assessment of the radiator and steady chair.

Question 13

What do lines 45–47 suggest about the secretary?

Show answer

Answer: B — He believes a practical adjustment will address Nora’s situation.

B is correct because his satisfied expression shows that he regards replacing her chair as a solution, while Nora’s thoughts reveal that physical comfort is not her difficulty. A turns his patronizing praise into unsupported suspicion; C confuses attention to her furniture with reconsideration of her exclusion; D substitutes embarrassment for his expressed satisfaction; E invents concern about the quality of records that the boys already trust.

Question 14

Which word best describes the secretary’s manner toward Nora in lines 35–39?

Show answer

Answer: D — Patronizing

D is correct because the secretary’s diminutive praise and offer of a better chair express kindness without treating Nora as an equal participant. A mistakes his smile for shared joking; B assumes an acknowledgment of unfair treatment that he never makes; C reads distrust into his acceptance of her observation; E takes his reference to an authority as unqualified admiration.

Question 15

What is the author’s primary purpose in ending with Nora moving the pawn herself?

Show answer

Answer: E — Assert independence

E is correct because Nora chooses to act at the board after others have confined her to watching and recording. A turns her private exploration into a claim of superiority that the unfinished game cannot establish; B assumes she seeks an audience after the secretary has turned away; C confuses exploring a missed move with correcting the accurately recorded draw; D mistakes her choice of the player’s unsteady chair for acceptance of the secretary’s proposed comfort.

Questions 16–20

The pool lies blue beneath the fence,
unbroken by a single hand;
the lifeguard’s chair, a watchful presence
above the bright and silent land.
5
Lane ropes lie coiled in even rows,
their floats unclipped, their anchors slack;
the stencilled depth the tile-edge shows
descends from three to nine and back.
A towel hangs from yesterday,
10
one corner stiff with summer salt;
a beetle crosses the deck halfway,
then pauses near a painted fault.
The rescue tube rests on its hook,
its rope wound tight in figure eights;
15
a clipboard in the office nook
records the pool’s own tests and dates.
Soon whistles, splashes, calls will rise,
and water will forget its glass;
for now it holds the morning skies
20
and lets the waiting shadows pass.
The gate clicks once; the first shoes sound,
the surface trembles, silver-thin;
the quiet settles toward the ground
and makes a place for noise to begin.

Question 16

The passage primarily captures

Show answer

Answer: A — a pool in the brief interval before its daily activity

The poem centers on a pool awaiting the start of the day, with activity only beginning at the end.

Question 17

In lines 17–18, the phrase “water will forget its glass” suggests that the coming activity will cause the water to lose

Show answer

Answer: A — a mirrorlike appearance

Before activity disturbs it, the water has the smooth, reflective appearance of glass.

Question 18

The sounds described at the start of the final stanza suggest that

Show answer

Answer: B — the day’s first arrival is beginning to break the stillness

The gate’s single click and the “first shoes” mark the earliest arrival, while the surface only “trembles” and the quiet “makes a place for noise to begin,” so stillness is just starting to break. A treats the sounds as an inspection of the rescue tube, but the poem never connects the gate to maintenance. C places the footsteps outside the fence, yet the surface trembles, so someone has come onto the deck. D reverses the moment: “first shoes” and noise about to begin signal an arrival, not a departure after the clipboard tests. E ties the newcomer to yesterday’s towel, but the poem does not identify who has entered.

Question 19

The tone of the passage is best described as

Show answer

Answer: D — calm and expectant

The poem quietly inventories the still pool while looking ahead to the activity about to begin, so the stance is calm and expectant. “Wistful and resigned” would mourn a day already lost; “clinical and detached” would be colder and more technical than the poised noticing; “drowsy and languid” would miss the readiness in “Soon” and the first shoes; and “playful and lighthearted” overstates humor the scene does not offer.

Question 20

The second through fourth stanzas are organized primarily by

Show answer

Answer: A — moving among observations of objects around the pool

The stanzas shift from lane ropes and a towel to the rescue tube and clipboard, forming a sequence of observations rather than a process or explanation.

Questions 21–25

When the river was diverted in the late
nineteenth century, the canal through one
manufacturing town ceased to carry boats.
The locks remained. To certain visitors,
5
their survival seemed to be evidence of
a community unwilling to abandon its past.
Yet the decisions that kept these walls
standing were actually far less uniform,
and less sentimental, than that judgment
10
suggests. The locks endured because their
usefulness changed unevenly, and because
removing them required an agreement among
people who wanted different things.
The earliest proposal for demolition came
15
from merchants seeking a wider road along
the canal bed. Engineers pointed out that
several lock walls supported neighboring
streets. Removing those walls would mean
rebuilding the streets, an expense absent
20
from the merchants’ estimate. Meanwhile,
the town owned the chambers, but adjoining
owners held rights of access across them.
Keeping the masonry was therefore cheaper
than settling several disputed claims.
25
This was a calculation about present costs,
rather than a declaration about the past.
Practical arguments did not settle every
case. In the eastern district, where canal
laborers had lived, residents opposed the
30
removal of the broad steps beside a lock.
The steps served as a meeting place, but
residents also argued that their labor had
helped build the town’s prosperity. A road
that erased the steps would make that labor
35
less visible. Their petition defended a
useful gathering place and a claim to civic
recognition; neither argument displaced
the other. The council retained the steps
while permitting warehouses nearby to be
40
cleared for the merchants’ proposed road.
Nor did their retention mean that the locks
remained untouched. Gates were sold, iron
fittings removed, and small workshops built
inside two emptied chambers. The council
45
approved these changes without treating
them as breaches of its earlier decision.
What survived was thus neither the working
canal nor a complete picture of its former
condition. It was a set of structures that
50
different groups could still put to use.
The temptation is to label this outcome
either enlightened preservation or mere
neglect. Both descriptions simplify the
choices available at the time. No common
55
plan explains every surviving wall; yet
the absence of such a plan does not make
survival accidental. Costs, property rights,
and demands for recognition together kept
the locks in place. Their lasting presence
60
records a civic argument whose participants
agreed on a result for different reasons.

Question 21

The passage is primarily concerned with

Show answer

Answer: B — the different interests that together accounted for the locks’ survival

B is correct because the passage explains how costs, access rights, and civic recognition together preserved the locks. A mistakes simultaneous motives for a chronological shift; C elevates one engineering concern into a general barrier to expansion; D confuses retaining structures with restoring the canal’s importance; E invents the common plan the passage explicitly denies.

Question 22

Which consideration does the passage NOT identify as a reason for retaining the locks or their associated structures?

Show answer

Answer: D — The prospect of income from visitors interested in the canal

D is correct because the passage mentions visitors’ interpretations but never identifies tourist income as a reason for retention. A overlooks the engineers’ warning about street reconstruction; B overlooks the expense of settling access claims; C overlooks the steps’ function as a meeting place; E overlooks the residents’ demand for civic recognition.

Question 23

What can most reasonably be inferred about the council’s decision concerning the steps and nearby warehouses?

Show answer

Answer: A — It accommodated part of the merchants’ proposal while preserving something valued by residents.

A is correct because retaining the steps while allowing warehouse clearance satisfied parts of the residents’ and merchants’ competing aims. B turns a particular compromise into a permanent policy; C attributes an unreported motive to the merchants; D mistakes approval for clearance as a postponement of all construction; E invents a comparison of the structures’ ages.

Question 24

Why does the author describe the alterations to the retained locks in lines 41–50?

Show answer

Answer: C — Qualify preservation

C is correct because the alterations show that preserving the locks did not mean keeping them intact or maintaining their original function. A mistakes a description of reuse for praise of economy; B confuses examples of alterations with an explanation of engineering methods; D interprets adaptation as a narrative of deterioration; E mistakes the council’s approval for the author’s defense of expansion.

Question 25

Which word best describes the author’s tone in lines 51–57?

Show answer

Answer: E — Measured

E is correct because the author weighs competing interpretations and rejects conclusions that oversimplify the decisions. A confuses discussion of the past with longing for it; B mistakes criticism of interpretations for an accusation against the townspeople; C overlooks the author’s careful consideration of the available choices; D mistakes the locks’ survival for an outcome the author unreservedly praises.

Questions 26–30

A jar of pond water may appear unchanged
while its microscopic inhabitants alter
their activity. Researchers studying this
water sometimes measure how rapidly its
5
microbes consume oxygen after a nutrient
is added. If consumption rises sooner on
a second addition, it is tempting to say
that the community has learned. Yet such
a description attaches an explanation to
10
an observation that cannot establish it.
One possibility is that individual cells
retain chemical changes from the first
feeding, allowing a faster response when
food returns. Another is that the first
15
feeding favors cells already equipped to
respond quickly. Their descendants then
dominate the second response. These two
processes produce a similar oxygen curve,
although only the first requires a cell
20
to preserve a trace of its own history.
An oxygen curve for the whole community
therefore cannot distinguish the two.
Separating these explanations requires
following individual cells through both
25
feedings. Yet isolating a cell can remove
neighbors whose secretions influence its
behavior. The experiment gains precision
about ancestry while changing the setting
in which the original pattern appeared.
30
Researchers can reduce this difficulty
by comparing isolated cells with intact
communities, but comparison cannot make
the two settings identical. The relevant
unit of observation need not be the one
35
most easily held beneath a microscope.
These limitations leave useful work to
be done. A quicker response remains an
important finding, even before its cause
is settled. Better methods may eventually
40
separate changes within cells from shifts
in the community’s membership. Until then,
calling the response memory is a useful
question disguised as a completed answer.

Question 26

Which statement best expresses the main idea of the passage?

Show answer

Answer: C — A community’s changed behavior can support explanations that are difficult to separate.

C is correct because the passage develops two explanations for faster oxygen consumption and examines the difficulty of distinguishing them experimentally. A elevates one experimental complication into the chief cause of feeding speed; B mistakes the tempting interpretation for an established conclusion; D overlooks the environmental changes introduced by isolation; E confuses uncertainty about causes with an absence of useful information.

Question 27

The passage supports all of the following claims about studying microbes EXCEPT

Show answer

Answer: A — Following cells individually preserves the conditions responsible for the original response.

A is correct because the passage explains that isolating cells can change the conditions under which the original response occurred. B overlooks the explicitly proposed dominance of quick responders’ descendants; C overlooks the proposed retention of chemical changes; D confuses the measurement’s inability to identify a cause with an inability to detect changed activity; E mistakes an incomplete remedy for a useless one.

Question 28

Suppose the same individual cells respond faster to a second feeding when studied in isolation. Which conclusion would the author most likely endorse?

Show answer

Answer: E — The result supports retention within cells, but its role in the intact community remains uncertain.

E is correct because the result supports a change within individual cells while leaving unresolved whether that mechanism explains behavior under community conditions. A turns support for one mechanism into proof that it alone explains the community; B assumes that neighboring cells necessarily hinder responses; C generalizes an isolated-cell finding to every community experiment; D contradicts the author’s recognition that findings remain valuable before their full explanation is settled.

Question 29

Why does the author discuss neighbors’ secretions in lines 25–29?

Show answer

Answer: B — Qualify isolation

B is correct because the secretions illustrate how isolation can alter a cell’s environment and thus limit the conclusions drawn from studying it. A confuses environmental influence with transmission between generations; C takes the experiment’s stated benefit for the purpose of the qualifying example; D mistakes a complication for confirmation of measurement accuracy; E turns a limitation into rejection of a comparison the author explicitly recommends.

Question 30

Which phrase best describes the author’s attitude toward further research in lines 36–41?

Show answer

Answer: D — Guardedly optimistic

D is correct because the author values the existing finding and anticipates better methods while describing future success as a possibility. A mistakes criticism of premature explanation for dismissal of research; B overlooks the explicit judgment that useful work remains; C ignores the uncertainty conveyed by ‘may eventually’; E converts acknowledgment of methodological limits into fear about future investigation.

Questions 31–35

A park admission fee is often presented
as a modest payment for a modest pleasure.
Yet this description assumes that a park
is chiefly a service delivered to whoever
5
happens to enter it. Public parks also give
a town something less easily itemized: a
place where strangers may remain without
having to explain what they plan to buy.
The proposed fee would be small, and its
10
advocates reasonably point to worn paths
and neglected trees. These are real costs.
But a small charge collected repeatedly
is no longer small to someone who crosses
the park each day. Nor does an exemption
15
for residents settle the matter: proving
that one belongs is itself a condition of
entry where none previously existed.
Some argue that payment would encourage
visitors to value the grounds. This claim
20
confuses the price of access with the care
people take once admitted. A ticket proves
a transaction; it cannot prove attachment.
Indeed, a frequent visitor who spends no
money may notice a damaged bench sooner
25
than someone who purchases an afternoon’s
recreation. Attention has no turnstile.
Maintenance still must be paid for. The
town should debate how to distribute that
expense through its common budget, rather
30
than quietly redefine the park’s public
character. The question is not whether the
trees deserve careful tending, but whether
our entitlement to their shade should end
whenever we leave our wallets at home.

Question 31

The author’s central argument is that

Show answer

Answer: C — Public financing should preserve a park’s availability without requiring visitors to justify entry.

C connects the proposed common funding with the defense of access free from purchase or proof of belonging. A mistakes the example of attachment for a proposed admission standard; B substitutes a reduced-fee solution for the author’s opposition to charging entry; D elevates responsible behavior above the passage’s concern with public access; E confuses noticing damage with financing maintenance.

Question 32

Which objection to charging admission does the author NOT offer?

Show answer

Answer: E — The fee would cost more to collect than it would earn.

E identifies an administrative-cost objection that the passage never makes. A overlooks the distinction between a single small payment and repeated charges; B overlooks the requirement to prove residency; C overlooks the distinction between a transaction and attachment; D overlooks the opening defense of a place where visitors need not buy anything.

Question 33

What principle underlies the author’s reasoning in lines 12–17?

Show answer

Answer: B — Public access can be limited by requirements other than price.

B follows from the claim that proving residency imposes a condition even when payment is waived. A repeats the assumption that the author challenges; C converts the burden of frequent payments into a justification for them; D invents a practical difficulty where the author objects to the requirement itself; E mistakes uniform treatment for the unconditional access the author defends.

Question 34

What is the primary purpose of the contrast between what a ticket proves and cannot prove in lines 21–22?

Show answer

Answer: D — Challenge equivalence

D identifies the author’s challenge to treating payment as evidence of caring about the park. A mistakes the valued quality mentioned for the contrast’s argumentative function; B imports the earlier concession about maintenance costs; C turns a limit on what payment demonstrates into an accusation of insincerity; E attributes to the author the incentive argument being disputed.

Question 35

Which word best describes the author’s manner of arguing against the fee?

Show answer

Answer: A — Measured

A fits an argument that acknowledges legitimate maintenance costs while carefully disputing the proposed solution. B mistakes acknowledgment of costs for acceptance of the fee; C overstates the emotional force of the closing challenge despite the fair treatment of advocates; D mistakes concern about changing public access for longing for a remembered past; E mistakes the turnstile metaphor for a primarily humorous approach.

Questions 36–40

In early modern European towns, a public
clock did more than mark passing hours.
Its dial offered a common reference for
people whose activities had been timed
5
by daylight, church services, or custom.
A council that paid to maintain a clock
could claim to provide a useful service
while also making its authority audible.
Yet buying a new mechanism was easier than
10
persuading everyone to obey its signals.
Municipal accounts often record payments
for repairs, new ropes, and keeper wages.
Such entries can make the spread of clock
time appear to be a steady administrative
15
achievement. Petitions tell another story.
Traders might challenge the hour at which
a market closed, while workers might say
that a bell had shortened their dinner.
These complaints did not necessarily mean
20
that townspeople rejected common hours.
They could instead demand that officials
honor the very standard they advertised.
The distinction matters. A protest over
an inaccurate clock could strengthen the
25
idea of public time even as it weakened
confidence in those charged with keeping
it. To call every dispute resistance to
change is to mistake an argument over the
administration for a rejection of reform.
30
Nor does a repaired clock prove that the
next day’s market opened at its command.
Historians therefore have to read these
records against one another. The council
recorded what it purchased; petitioners
35
recorded what they wished to have changed.
Neither source gives a complete account
of ordinary practice. Those who adjusted
their routines without complaint rarely
explained themselves. The archive makes
40
conflict audible, but its silences cannot
tell us how readily agreement was reached.

Question 36

Which statement best expresses the main idea of the passage?

Show answer

Answer: E — Records of public clocks reveal negotiations over authority while limiting what historians can conclude about everyday behavior.

E connects the passage’s account of contested public time with its argument about the limits of surviving evidence. A mistakes an offered standard for demonstrated acceptance; B turns complementary but incomplete sources into a hierarchy of completeness; C confuses criticism of administration with rejection of authority; D expands a distinction about clocks into a general rule about technological change.

Question 37

The passage suggests all of the following about records of public timekeeping EXCEPT

Show answer

Answer: C — The absence of complaints establishes that most townspeople willingly accepted official hours.

C is the exception because the final paragraph explicitly refuses to treat archival silence as evidence of ready agreement. A reflects the distinction between a standard and its administration; B reflects the warning that repairs do not prove obedience; D reflects the impression municipal accounts can create; E reflects the different concerns recorded by councils and petitioners.

Question 38

The distinction developed in lines 23–29 implies that a demand for a more accurate public clock could best be understood as which of the following?

Show answer

Answer: A — An appeal to the same standard that helped justify the council’s authority

A follows because demanding accuracy can affirm the value of public time while challenging the officials responsible for it. B extends support for an accurate clock into unconditional acceptance of official schedules; C invents a proposed transfer of responsibility; D mistakes criticism of a clock’s operation for rejection of common time; E confuses dissatisfaction with performance with a judgment of permanent incapacity.

Question 39

Which word best describes the author’s attitude toward the evidentiary value of town records in lines 30–41?

Show answer

Answer: B — Circumspect

B is correct because the author carefully distinguishes what records establish from what they leave uncertain. A mistakes limits on evidence for rejection of its usefulness; C assumes a disappointed loss of faith that the passage never expresses; D confuses attention to historical documents with unquestioning respect; E overlooks the author’s repeated warnings against easy conclusions.

Question 40

In lines 37–39, the author mentions people who adjusted their routines without leaving complaints primarily to

Show answer

Answer: D — Limit conclusions

D is correct because the unrecorded experiences of quiet participants restrict conclusions historians can draw from documented disputes. A mistakes possible silent adjustment for evidence of general agreement; B assumes the passage explains why people complied when it only notes their absence from the record; C treats missing testimony as grounds for allocating blame; E mistakes uncertainty about behavior for suspicion about intentions.

In the app the clock runs, you can pause and pick up where you left off, every question is explained afterwards, and your score is estimated on the test’s own scale. Extended time (1.5× or 2×) is there if you have an accommodation.

Take the full practice test in the app

The rest of the test

The full SSAT Upper practice test · Everything on the SSAT Upper