Study on the flyACT

Study on the flyACTReadingCommand of evidence and support

Reading

Command of evidence and support — ACT practice questions

  • 70 practice questions in the app
  • Free

Practice 70 Command of evidence and support questions in the app

What this topic is

Command of evidence and support questions work in two directions.

Some give a claim and ask which quotation or detail best supports it; others ask which detail the author offers as support for a point. The best evidence directly proves the specific claim, not just the general topic, so a quotation that mentions the right subject but says something different is wrong.

For a claim that a scientist doubted her own results, the right quotation would show doubt, not simply describe the experiment. ACT choices are often short excerpts from the passage, and each should be checked against the exact wording of the claim.

Sample questions

Pick an answer to see whether it is right — nothing is saved, and nothing needs an account.

HUMANITIES: This passage is adapted from the essay “The Bell That Wasn’t Lost.”

A bronze bell displayed with a neat date
and a single noun—COURTHOUSE, 1891—appears
to have a fixed identity. The label
invites us to imagine that the object
5
spent its working life announcing court
sessions and then retired to a pedestal.
Yet civic objects are rarely so obedient.
They are carried, renamed, and put to uses
their makers did not anticipate. Their
10
history is less like a portrait sealed in
a frame than a coat patched while someone
is still wearing it.
The historian June Arata encountered such
an object while preparing an exhibition
15
about public sound in the town of Morrow.
Residents told her that the old courthouse
bell had been donated to a wartime metal
drive in 1943. A newspaper editorial from
that year praised citizens for
20
surrendering iron gates and farm
equipment, and a photograph showed an
empty space in the courthouse tower. June
began drafting a label about a community
silencing one symbol of law to support a
25
national emergency.
Then a volunteer brought her the 1951
Morrow High School yearbook. In a
photograph of a football rally, a bell
stood beside the school steps. Its flared
30
lip, paired ridges, and repaired wooden
wheel matched the courthouse bell in an
earlier photograph. June’s solemn
certainty gave way first to an incredulous
laugh and then to a page of questions.
35
Instead of discarding the awkward evidence
as a mistaken caption or a look-alike
bell, she postponed the exhibition and
followed the object into school-board
minutes, insurance maps, and maintenance
40
receipts.
A 1944 council record supplied one
explanation: engineers had declared the
courthouse tower unsafe, so workers
removed the bell during the same month as
45
the metal drive. That coincidence had
apparently fused two events in local
memory. But a later receipt revised even
this account. The council had not stored
the bell, as June initially assumed; in
50
1947 it sold the bell to the high school
for one dollar. There the bell marked
football victories, summoned volunteer
firefighters, and, during a 1960 flood,
signaled when families could collect clean
55
water in the gymnasium. By then, it had
served two buildings and several kinds of
assembly.
Some preservationists argue that moving an
object away from its original setting
60
strips it of meaning. Context certainly
matters: in a courthouse tower, the bell
made municipal authority audible across
town. Yet the Morrow bell is a useful
counterexample. Its relocation did not
65
make it meaningless; it accumulated
another public role. The same sound that
once called lawyers to order later
coordinated teenagers, firefighters, and
flood relief. Treating only its first
70
placement as authentic would preserve one
chapter by tearing out the next three.
The bell also unsettles the opposite
claim—that continuous use guarantees
continuous meaning. Students who rang it
75
after football games called it the Victory
Bell and apparently did not know its
courthouse history. Use preserved the
object but not every story attached to it.
When June interviewed former students,
80
several were surprised that the bell had
ever hung anywhere else. One said he had
assumed the ridges were decorative “speed
lines” appropriate to a sports trophy.
What, then, should a museum label call it?
85
“Courthouse bell” is accurate but
incomplete; “school bell” has the same
problem. June finally titled the display
“A Bell in Transit” and printed a timeline
of its different jobs. Beside the bell,
90
she placed a reproduction of the 1951
photograph that had disrupted her first
account. The label did not replace one
tidy legend with another. It showed how
one explanation arose, why evidence
95
defeated it, and what remained uncertain:
no record reveals who proposed the
one-dollar sale.
This approach asks more of viewers than a
noun and a date do. It also offers more. A
100
label can be a verdict, pretending the
past has finished speaking, or it can be a
trail marker that shows where an inquiry
has traveled and where the path
disappears. The Morrow bell deserves the
105
second kind. Its value lies not in having
escaped change but in making change
audible.

Question 1Easier

Which quotation best supports the claim that the finished display preserved uncertainty rather than offering a single settled explanation?

Show answer

Answer: B — “The label did not replace one tidy legend with another.”

The statement that the label did not substitute one tidy legend for another directly supports the claim that the display acknowledged complexity and uncertainty.

Question 2Easier

Which detail does the author cite as a use of the bell while it was at the high school?

Show answer

Answer: D — It signaled when families could collect clean water during a flood.

The passage identifies calling firefighters and coordinating flood relief as uses of the bell during its time at the high school.

Every question is picked for where you are right now, wrong answers come back until they stick, and it all works offline.

Practice 70 Command of evidence and support questions in the app

More ACT topics

Reading

Everything on the ACT

Study on the fly is an independent study tool and is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by any testing organization, school, or government body.

ACT® is a registered trademark of ACT Education Corp., which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, this product.

All practice questions and passages are original works created for Study on the fly and are not reproduced from any official test.